ArticleHeliyon2024
A machine learning based method for constructing group profiles of university students.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of virtual simulations in the practical teaching of clinical microbiology laboratory courses.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study facilitates university student profiling by constructing a prediction model to forecast the classification of future students participating in a survey, thereby enhancing the utility and effectiveness of the questionnaire approach. In the context of the ongoing digital transformation of campuses, higher education institutions are increasingly prioritizing student educational development. This shift aligns with the maturation of big data technology, prompting scholars to focus on profiling university student education. While earlier research in this area, particularly foreign studies, focus on extracting data from specific learning contexts and often relied on single data sources, our study addresses these limitations. We employ a comprehensive approach, incorporating questionnaire surveys to capture a diverse array of student data. Considering various university student attributes, we create a holistic profile of the student population. Furthermore, we use clustering techniques to develop a categorical prediction model. In our clustering analysis, we employ the K-means algorithm to group student survey data. The results reveal four distinct student profiles: Diligent Learners, Earnest Individuals, Discerning Achievers, and Moral Advocates. These profiles are subsequently used to label student groups. For the classification task, we leverage these labels to establish a prediction model based on the Back Propagation neural network, with the goal of assigning students to their respective groups. Through meticulous model optimization, an impressive classification accuracy of 90.22% is achieved. Our research offers a novel perspective and serves as a valuable methodological reference for university student profiling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.