ArticleHeliyon2024
Cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking derived left atrial strain in the diagnosis of patients with constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the diagnostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking (CMR-FT) divided left atrial (LA) strain in differentiating constrictive pericarditis (CP) and restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM). Methods: Patients with CP (n = 40) and RCM (n = 40), and another 40 normal control group were retrospectively enrolled over a period of 8 years at a tertiary cardiac centre. Left ventricular (LV) and biatrial strain and strain rate (SR) were measured. Atrial strain was used to differentiate between patients with CP and RCM. Then, patients were grouped according to their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), either ≥50% or < 50%. A deeper analysis was done to evaluate the diagnostic value of atrial strain in these subgroups. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were used to assess the accuracy of myocardial strain based on CMR FT for the differential diagnosis of CP and RCM. Results: LV and LA strain and SR were significantly lower in patients with CP and RCM than those in the normal controls (P < 0.05). LA strain and SR were significantly lower in the RCM group than in the CP group (P < 0.05). In patients with either LVEF≥50% or＜50%, LA strain were lower in the RCM group than in the CP group (P < 0.05). ROC analysis showed that LA stored strain (LA-εs) had a good differential diagnostic value for CP and RCM, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.811 and an optimal cutoff value of 6.98%, above this value it tends to develop CP. Further, an excellent differential diagnostic value was found in patients with LVEF＜50%, with an AUC of 0.955. Conclusion: LA strain analysis obtained by CMR-FT provides good differential diagnostic value for distinguishing CP from RCM, especially in patients with LVEF＜50%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.