ArticleHeliyon2024
Classification of skin blemishes with cell phone images using deep learning techniques.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin blemishes can be caused by multiple events or diseases and, in some cases, it is difficult to distinguish where they come from. Therefore, there may be cases with a dangerous origin that go unnoticed or the opposite case (which can lead to overcrowding of health services). To avoid this, the use of artificial intelligence-based classifiers using images taken with mobile devices is proposed; this would help in the initial screening process and provide some information to the patient prior to their final diagnosis. To this end, this work proposes an optimization mechanism based on two phases in which a global search for the best classifiers (from among more than 150 combinations) is carried out, and, in the second phase, the best candidates are subjected to a phase of evaluation of the robustness of the system by applying the cross-validation technique. The results obtained reach 99.95% accuracy for the best case and 99.75% AUC. Comparing the developed classifier with previous works, an improvement in terms of classification rate is appreciated, as well as in the reduction of the classifier complexity, which allows our classifier to be integrated in a specific purpose system with few computational resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.