Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38601590›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2024

Promoting knowledge translation: An ecosystem approach to evidence in health.

Marcelle Miranda da Silva, Cristina Rosa Soares Lavareda Baixinho, Maria Fátima Mendes Marques, Claudia Sousa Oliveira, Renata de Moura Bubadué, Samhira Vieira Franco de Souza, Ivone Evangelista Cabral

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Qualitative research: the heart of implementation studies.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marcelle Miranda da SilvaEscola de Enfermagem Ana Nery, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 275 St Afonso Cavalcanti, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Cristina Rosa Soares Lavareda BaixinhoNursing Reserach, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Av, Prof. Egas Moniz, 1600-190, Lisboa, Portugal.
Maria Fátima Mendes MarquesNursing Reserach, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Av, Prof. Egas Moniz, 1600-190, Lisboa, Portugal.
Claudia Sousa OliveiraJean Piaget Higher School of Health, Jean Piaget Polytechnic Institute of the South, Jardim nº 1 do Enxerim, 8300-025, Silves, Portugal.
Renata de Moura BubaduéEscola de Enfermagem Ana Nery, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 275 St Afonso Cavalcanti, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Samhira Vieira Franco de SouzaEscola de Enfermagem Ana Nery, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 275 St Afonso Cavalcanti, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Ivone Evangelista CabralEscola de Enfermagem Ana Nery, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 275 St Afonso Cavalcanti, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dissemination and implementation of evidence in health contexts have been a concern of several international organizations responsible for recommending actions to health policymakers. World Health Organization has been advocating for an ecosystem of evidence to improve clinical practice and health professional education. Thus, in this article, we address the challenges to developing the evidence ecosystem from the point of view of health professional education, considering the contexts of practice and teaching, focused on knowledge translation. There are three pivotal challenges: producing qualified knowledge; adequate communication of the synthesized evidence; and institutional policy to sustain the implemented evidence in continuous and updated flow. The evidence ecosystem helps to understand these flows between the production and implementation of knowledge, based on the capacity and resources of different health systems. It needs to be developed in the field of health professional education, feedback in the contexts of practice and teaching, to contribute to third-generation knowledge being used by different users of health services.

Indexed as

AttitudesBiomedicalEvidence-based practiceHealth educationHealth knowledgeHealth PersonnelPracticeTranslational science

Identifiers

PMID38601590
PMCPMC11004558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.