ArticleHeliyon2024
Gudermannian neural network procedure for the nonlinear prey-predator dynamical system.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study performs the design of a novel Gudermannian neural networks (GNNs) for the nonlinear dynamics of prey-predator system (NDPPS). The process of GNNs is applied using the global and local search approaches named as genetic algorithm and interior-point algorithms, i.e., GNNs-GA-IPA. An error-based merit function is constructed using the NDPPS and its initial conditions and then optimized by the hybrid of GA-IPA. Six cases of the NDPPS using the variable coefficients have been presented and the correctness is observed through the overlapping of the obtained and Runge-Kutta reference results. The results of the NDPPS have been performed between 0 and 5 using the step size 0.02. The graph of absolute error are performed around 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.