ArticleHeliyon2024
Low-dose CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional minimally invasive robot.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accurate puncture of targets in the lower lung lobes with respiratory motion using a teleoperated robotic system and low-dose computed tomography fluoroscopy: an experimental animal study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and accuracy of a low-dose CT fluoroscopy-guided remote-controlled robotic real-time puncture procedure. Methods: The study involved two control groups with Taguchi method: Group A, which underwent low-dose traditional CT-guided manual puncture (blank control), and Group B, which underwent conditional control puncture. Additionally, an experimental group, Group C, underwent CT fluoroscopy-guided remote-controlled robotic real-time puncture. In a phantom experiment, various simulated targets were punctured, while in an animal experiment, attempts were made to puncture targets in different organs of four pigs. The number of needle adjustments, puncture time, total puncture operation time, and radiation dose were analyzed to evaluate the robot system. Results: Successful punctures were achieved for each target, and no complications were observed. Dates were calculated for all parameters using Taguchi method. Conclusion: The low-dose CT fluoroscopy-guided puncture robot system is a safe, feasible, and equally accurate alternative to traditional manual puncture procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.