ArticleHeliyon2024
Prognostic effects of different treatment modalities for hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Experience of two tertiary hospitals in Southwestern China.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Novel laryngeal preservation technique in postcricoid hypopharyngeal carcinoma: a case-series study.BMC surgery · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The prognostic effects of different treatment modalities on patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPSCC) remain unclear. Methods: HPSCC patients diagnosed and treated at either West China Hospital or Sichuan Cancer Hospital between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019, were enrolled in this retrospective, real-world study. Survival rates were presented using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using log-rank tests. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify the predictors of overall survival (OS). Subgroup analyses were conducted for patients with advanced-stage HPSCC (stages III and IV and category T4). Results: A total of 527 patients with HPSCC were included. Patients receiving SRC (surgery, radiotherapy [RT], and chemotherapy) showed the best OS (p < 0.0001). In comparison with RT alone, both surgery alone (all cases: hazard ratio [HR] = 0.39, p = 0.0018; stage IV cases: HR = 0.38, p = 0.0085) and surgery-based multimodality treatment (SBMT; all cases: HR = 0.27, p < 0.0001; stage IV cases: HR = 0.30, p = 0.00025) showed prognostic benefits, while SBMT also showed survival priority over chemoradiotherapy (CRT; all cases: HR = 0.52, p < 0.0001; stage IV cases: HR = 0.59, p = 0.0033). Moreover, patients who underwent surgery alone had comparable OS to those who underwent SBMT (all patients: p = 0.13; stage IV cases: p = 0.34), while CRT yielded similar prognostic outcomes as RT alone (all patients: p = 0.054; stage IV cases: p = 0.11). Conclusions: Surgery alone was comparable to SBMT and superior to RT/CRT in terms of OS in patients with HPSCC. We suggest that surgery should be encouraged for the treatment of HPSCC, even in patients with advanced-stage disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.