Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38601509›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Through the eyes of community health workers: what was needed to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the Missouri Southeast region.

Anusha Ban, Ashish Shrestha, Carissa Van den Berk-Clark, Janice Ballard, Richard Logan, Tripp Logan, Anne Francioni, Megan Murray, Elizabeth A Baker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Anusha BanCollege for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, United States.
Ashish ShresthaCollege for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, United States.
Carissa Van den Berk-ClarkDepartment of Family & Community Medicine, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, United States.
Janice BallardOne Heart Many Hands, Caruthersville, MO, United States.
Richard LoganL and S Pharmacy, Charleston, MO, United States.
Tripp LoganL and S Pharmacy, Charleston, MO, United States.
Anne FrancioniWhole Kids Outreach, Ellington, MO, United States.
Megan MurraySoutheastern Missouri Area Health Education Center, Poplar Bluff, MO, United States.
Elizabeth A BakerCollege for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO, United States.
Saint Louis University · USUniversity of Charleston · USAbout Special Kids · USSaint Louis University · ESThree Rivers College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public health emergencies, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, elucidate the strengths, weaknesses, and significant gaps in infrastructure, compatibility and consistency in communication systems, as well as the quality of collaborative relationships, and provider and workforce capacity. They also expose longstanding patterns of mistrust in the government and healthcare systems, and inadequacy in socio-economic infrastructures. These issues resulted in higher COVID-19 infection and mortality rates, and lower vaccination rates in many rural counties across the nation, including Missouri. In response to these challenges, the COVID-19 Response Network was formed in the Southeast corner of the state. The Network was a community-academic partnership that brought together community and faith-based leaders, academicians, healthcare providers and administrators, public health practitioners, and pharmacists to facilitate collaboration on education and outreach efforts aimed at reducing vaccine inequity in the 16-county project area. Importantly, the Network also included Community Health Workers (CHWs) who worked with these different agencies and organizations and were at the heart of implementing Network activities. The intent of this study was to assess their perspectives on the factors that influenced community engagement and communication strategies, and increased vaccine uptake in rural Missouri. Qualitative methods, including in-depth interviews, were used to explore the professional and personal experiences of CHWs working at the grassroots level during an ongoing pandemic. Narrative analysis revealed effective communication and engagement strategies for increasing vaccine uptake in rural communities. For instance, fear-based messaging was perceived as coercive and met with resistance. In contrast, messages that shared personal experiences and catered to the human need to protect their loved ones were more effective. Trust in the source of information was critical. This study highlights the significance of exploring and leveraging the capacities of trusted community members like CHWs to increase the effectiveness of public health interventions in rural communities.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCommunity Health WorkersHumansMissouriPandemicsCOVID-19 Vaccinescommunity engagementcommunity health workersCOVID-19rural healthvaccine equity

Identifiers

PMID38601509
PMCPMC11004485
OpenAlexW4393231165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.