ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating ChatGPT's Capabilities on Orthopedic Training Examinations: An Analysis of New Image Processing Features.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Implications of ChatGPT-assisted Multimodal Pre-operative Assessment in Elderly Pertrochanteric Fracture Patients: An Exploratory Study.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
- Accuracy Is Not Enough: Reasoning and Reference Reliability in Orthopaedic Large Language Model (LLM) Applications.Cureus · 2026Article
- Systematic Review on Large Language Models in Orthopaedic Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Exploring ChatGPT's Efficacy in Orthopaedic Arthroplasty Questions Compared to Adult Reconstruction Surgeons.Arthroplasty today · 2025Article
- Preparing for Vascular Surgery Board Certification: A Comparative Study Using Large Language Models.Cureus · 2025Article
- Multimodal Performance of GPT-4 in Complex Ophthalmology Cases.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- An Assessment of the Performance of Different Chatbots on Shoulder and Elbow Questions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating retrieval augmented generation and ChatGPT's accuracy on orthopaedic examination assessment questions.Annals of joint · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparative performance analysis of large language models: ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4 and Google Gemini in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Article
- The Performance of ChatGPT on the American Society for Surgery of the Hand Self-Assessment Examination.Cureus · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The efficacy of integrating artificial intelligence (AI) models like ChatGPT into the medical field, specifically orthopedic surgery, has yet to be fully determined. The most recent adaptation of ChatGPT that has yet to be explored is its image analysis capabilities. This study assesses ChatGPT's performance in answering Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE) questions, including those that require image analysis. Methods Questions from the 2014, 2015, 2021, and 2022 AAOS OITE were screened for inclusion. All questions without images were entered into ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0 twice. Questions that necessitated the use of images were only entered into ChatGPT 4.0 twice, as this is the only version of the system that can analyze images. The responses were recorded and compared to AAOS's correct answers, evaluating the AI's accuracy and precision. Results A total of 940 questions were included in the final analysis (457 questions with images and 483 questions without images). ChatGPT 4.0 performed significantly better on questions that did not require image analysis (67.81% vs 47.59%, p<0.001). Discussion While the use of AI in orthopedics is an intriguing possibility, this evaluation demonstrates how, even with the addition of image processing capabilities, ChatGPT still falls short in terms of its accuracy. As AI technology evolves, ongoing research is vital to harness AI's potential effectively, ensuring it complements rather than attempts to replace the nuanced skills of orthopedic surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.