Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38601355›Full record

ArticleMalariaWorld journal2016

Controlling malaria in pregnancy: how far from the Abuja targets?

Oyindamola B Yusuf, Joshua O Akinyemi, Adeniyi F Fagbamigbe, IkeOluwapo O Ajayi, Elijah A Bamgboye, Evelyn Ngige, Kawu Issa, Emmanuel Abatta, Onoride Ezire, Perpertual Amida and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MalariaWorld journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Oyindamola B YusufEpidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, Institute of Advanced Medical Research and Training, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Joshua O AkinyemiDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Adeniyi F FagbamigbeDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
IkeOluwapo O AjayiEpidemiology and Medical Statistics Unit, Institute of Advanced Medical Research and Training, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Elijah A BamgboyeDepartment of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Evelyn NgigeNational AIDS/STD Control Programme, Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria.
Kawu IssaNational AIDS/STD Control Programme, Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria.
Emmanuel AbattaNational AIDS/STD Control Programme, Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria.
Onoride EzireNational AIDS/STD Control Programme, Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria.
Perpertual AmidaNational AIDS/STD Control Programme, Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria.
Adebobola BashorunNational AIDS/STD Control Programme, Federal Ministry of Health, Abuja, Nigeria.
University of Ibadan · NG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Roll Back Malaria (RBM) initiative recommended that all pregnant women receive Inter mittent Preventive Treatment (IPTp) and that by 2010 at least 80% of people at risk of malaria (including pregnant women) use insecticide-treated bednets (ITN) in areas with stable transmission. We evaluated ITN/IPTp coverage, explored its associated factors, and estimated the number of pregnancies protected from malaria. Materials and methods: This analysis was based on data from the 2012 National HIV/AIDS and Reproductive Health Survey (NARHS Plus). To assess ITN coverage, we used the population of women that was pregnant (n=22,438) at the time of the survey. For IPTp coverage, we used women that had a live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey (n= 118,187) and extracted the population of pregnant women that, during their last pregnancy, received drugs for protection against malaria. We estimated the number of live births using the projected population of females in each state, population of women of child -bearing age and the total fertility rate. The estimated number of pregnancies covered/protected by ITN and IPTp was obtained from a product of the estimated live births and the reported coverage. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with ITN and IPTp use. Results: We estimated that there were 5,798,897 live births in Nigeria in 2012, of which 3,537,327 and 2,302,162 pregnancies were protected by ITN and IPTp, respectively. Four of 36 states achieved the 80% RBM target for ITN coverage. No state achieved the 100% target for IPTp. Education and socio-economic status were associated with IPTp use. Conclusion: ITN cover age was higher than in previous estimates even though it is still below the RBM targets. However, IPTp coverage remained low in 2012 and was not likely to increase to match the 2015 target coverage of 100%.

Identifiers

PMID38601355
PMCPMC11003214
OpenAlexW4394739303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.