ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2024
Melt Electrowriting Combined with Fused Deposition Modeling Printing for the Fabrication of Three-Dimensional Biomimetic Scaffolds for Osteotendinous Junction Regeneration.
Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart-responsive electrospun scaffolds (SRES) for neural repair: Recent advances and future prospects.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- From physical modalities to energy-responsive biomaterials: Current strategies and challenges in tendon-to-bone healing.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Gradient scaffolds in bone-soft tissue interface engineering: Structural characteristics, fabrication techniques, and emerging trends.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to explore a novel scaffold for osteotendinous junction regeneration and to preliminarily verify its osteogenic and tenogenic abilities in vitro. Methods: A polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffold with aligned and orthogonal fibers was created using melt electrowriting (MEW) and fused deposition modeling (FDM). The scaffold was coated with Type I collagen, and hydroxyapatite was carefully added to separate the regions intended for bone and tendon regeneration, before being rolled into a cylindrical shape. Human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs) were seeded to evaluate viability and differentiation. Scaffold characterization was performed with Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Osteogenesis was assessed by alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and Alizarin red staining, while immunostaining and transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) evaluated osteogenic and tendogenic markers. Results: Scaffolds were developed in four variations: aligned (A), collagen-coated aligned (A+C), orthogonal (O), and mineral-coated orthogonal (O+M). SEM analysis confirmed surface morphology and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) verified mineral coating on O+M types. Hydrophilicity and mechanical properties were optimized in modified scaffolds, with A+C showing increased tensile strength and O+M improved in compression. hADSCs demonstrated good viability and morphology across scaffolds, withO+M scaffolds showing higher cell proliferation and osteogenic potential, and A and A+C scaffolds supporting tenogenic differentiation. Conclusion: This study confirms the potential of a novel PCL scaffold with distinct regions for osteogenic and tenogenic differentiation, supporting the regeneration of osteotendinous junctions in vitro.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.