ArticleGland surgery2024
Clinical effectiveness of microporous polysaccharide hemospheres in mastectomy for patients with breast cancer.
Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH) are hydrophilic particles administered to reduce the incidence of seroma after mastectomy, but their clinical effectiveness remains controversial. Because a previous randomized, controlled study in a small cohort could not demonstrate the effectiveness of MPH in breast surgery, we evaluated their effectiveness in surgery for breast cancer in a larger cohort. Methods: Medical records of 352 patients who underwent total mastectomy for breast cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data were compared between 126 patients who received MPH during surgery (MPH group) and 226 who did not (control group) according to surgical procedures. Patients were significantly older in the MPH group than in the control group because of selection bias, but other factors, such as body mass index and number of dissected lymph nodes, did not differ between groups. Results: When analyzed by use of axillary manipulation, the drain placement period and drainage volume were significantly less in the MPH group than in the control group for patients with mastectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Only drainage volume was significantly less in the MPH group for patients with mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection. The frequency of total postoperative complications, such as seroma requiring puncture, did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Use of MPH may decrease the postoperative drainage volume and drain placement period in mastectomy for patients with breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.