Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38601291›Full record

ArticleGland surgery2024

Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction with tissue expander entirely covered by acellular dermal matrix: feasibility, safety and histological features resulting from the first 64 procedures.

Marco Bernini, Giacomo Gigliucci, Dario Cassetti, Cinzia Tommasi, Ilaria Gaggelli, Lorenzo Arlia, Carlotta Becherini, Viola Salvestrini, Luca Visani, Jacopo Nori Cucchiari and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gland surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco BerniniBreast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giacomo GigliucciBreast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Dario CassettiBreast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Cinzia TommasiBreast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Ilaria GaggelliBreast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo ArliaBreast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Carlotta BecheriniRadiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Viola SalvestriniRadiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Luca VisaniRadiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Jacopo Nori CucchiariDiagnostic Senology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Diego De BenedettoDiagnostic Senology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Federica Di NaroDiagnostic Senology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Giulia BicchieraiDiagnostic Senology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Chiara BelliniDiagnostic Senology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Simonetta BianchiPathology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo OrzalesiBreast Surgery Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi - University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Lorenzo LiviRadiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Icro MeattiniRadiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITUniversity of Florence · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Reconstructive options that can be used following conservative mastectomy, skin-, nipple-sparing and skin-reducing mastectomies, allow a remarkable variety of safe methods to restore the natural shape and aesthetics of the breast mound. In case of two-stage breast reconstruction, tissue expanders (TEs) are usually placed in a subpectoral position. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety of two-step reconstruction with TE in pre-pectoral position covered by acellular dermal matrix (ADM). Methods: Between March 2021 and May 2023, at the Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, 55 patients with BRCA 1/2 mutations or early breast cancer underwent conservative mastectomy with immediate pre-pectoral reconstruction using TE covered with ADM, followed by a second surgery with replacement of the expander with definitive prosthesis. Demographic, oncological, and histological data along with surgical complications were recorded. Results: A total of 64 conservative mastectomies were performed. In 2 patients (3.1%) complications were found that required reintervention and, in both cases, the TE had to be removed. Two patients developed hematoma and one patient developed seroma. Two patients showed wound dehiscence, both healed after conservative treatment and without implant exposure. No case of necrosis of the skin or nipple-areola complex has been observed, neither of capsular contracture. Capsule formed around TE was populated with cells and blood vessels and showed a thin area of synovial metaplasia. Conclusions: In selected cases it may be more cautious to perform a two-stage breast reconstruction after radical breast surgery by means of TEs. The placement of TEs in pre-pectoral position combines the excellent aesthetic and functional results of the pre-pectoral philosophy with a quite safer and more prudent two-step approach. Our experience reports optimistic results: the ADM covering the TE is seen successfully integrating during tissue expansion and becoming a vascularised new self-tissue. Complications rates are low and such ADM-assisted two-stage pre-pectoral reconstructive technique is a safe, practical, and reproducible method.

Indexed as

acellular dermal matrix (ADM)ADM-wrapped tissue expander (ADM-wrapped TE)Pre-pectoral breast reconstruction (PPBR)tissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID38601291
PMCPMC11002490
OpenAlexW4393203398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.