Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38601264›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2024

Use of Daily Web-Based, Real-Time Feedback to Improve Patient and Family Experience.

Lisa M Remer, Kristin Line, Alyssa Paolella, Justin M Rozniak, Evaline A Alessandrini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lisa M RemerDivision of Hospital Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6760-9679
Kristin LineJames M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Alyssa PaolellaJames M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Justin M RozniakDepartment of Information Services, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Evaline A AlessandriniDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time feedback is a growing trend in patient- and family experience (PFE) work as it allows for immediate service recovery, though it typically requires a significant investment of time and financial resources. We describe a partnership with our "edutainment" system to administer an automated daily experience question (the "Daily Pulse Measure [DPM]") that allowed targeted just-in-time responses to low scores with minimal administrative cost. Through a series of Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles guided by family feedback, the question was created and modified, and the use of the question spread to all hospital units. The response rate was 23%, similar to our Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey response rate of 24% during the study period. Though the DPM did not have a consistent impact on the results of the 2 PFE survey questions we evaluated, units with improved PFE scores after the DPM roll-out tended to have more robust service recovery than those with low scores.

Indexed as

leadership roundingpatient feedbackpediatricssurvey datatechnology

Identifiers

PMID38601264
PMCPMC11005486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.