ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
Placement of immediate dental implants in extraction sockets exhibiting the apical pathosis. A meta-analysis.
Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immediate implant placement in infected extraction sockets: A scoping review of case selection, decontamination protocols, clinical outcomes and complications.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2026Article
- Clinical and radiographic changes in immediate implant placement versus delayed implant placement: AnBioinformation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: It is commonly accepted that immediate implantation is the best option for patients since it shortens the time patients must wait for ultimate restoration and provides a predictable functional and aesthetic result. However, this approach is still controversial in patients with apical pathosis. The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of immediate implant insertion in patients with apical pathosis. Material and methods: Between 2000 and 2023, PRISMA-compliant keywords were used to search PubMed, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Library. All English-language clinical studies that met PICOS criteria were included in a manual search. The included studies' demographic profile and event data for immediate dental implantation success in patients with or without apical pathosis were meta-analyzed using RevMan. The implant survival rate was assessed using risk ratio of plaque index and bleeding index. Begg's test using MedCalc and RevMan risk of bias assessment assessed publication bias. Results: A meta-analysis of 10 trials with 849 dental implantation patients found a substantial difference in initial implant placement success rates in infected sites. The pooled risk ratio for plaque index is 0.59 (95% CI: 0.36-0.96) with heterogeneity of Tau Conclusion: The placement of immediate implants in locations affected by apical pathosis is a clinically beneficial surgery, resulting in favorable aesthetic and functional outcomes for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.