Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38601175›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2024

Management of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia in low-to-middle income countries: current challenges and the way forward.

Suvro Sankha Datta, Sigbjørn Berentsen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Autoimmune haemolytic anaemias.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  4. Time for newer approach in age-old AIHA: Daratumumab?The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024
    Article
  5. Time for newer approach in age-old AIHA.The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suvro Sankha DattaTata Medical Centre, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Sigbjørn BerentsenDepartment of Research and Innovation, Haugesund Hospital, Helse Fonna Hospital Trust, Haugesund, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) is a common term for several disorders that differ from one another in terms of aetiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, and treatment. Therapy is becoming increasingly differentiated and evidence-based, and several new established and investigational therapeutic approaches have appeared during recent years. While this development has resulted in therapeutic improvements, it also carries increased medical and financial requirements for optimal diagnosis, subgrouping, and individualization of therapy, including the use of more advanced laboratory tests and expensive drugs. In this brief Viewpoint review, we first summarize the diagnostic workup of AIHA subgroups and the respective therapies that are currently considered optimal. We then compare these principles with real-world data from India, the world's largest nation by population and a typical low-to-middle income country. We identify major deficiencies and limitations in general and laboratory resources, real-life diagnostic procedures, and therapeutic practices. Incomplete diagnostic workup, overuse of corticosteroids, lack of access to more specific treatments, and poor follow-up of patients are the rule more than exceptions. Although it may not seem realistic to resolve all challenges, we try to outline some ways towards an improved management of patients with AIHA.

Indexed as

Autoimmune haemolytic anaemiaDiagnosisLow-to-middle income countriesReal-world dataTreatment

Identifiers

PMID38601175
PMCPMC11004394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.