ReviewConsortium psychiatricum2021
Community-based Mental Health Services in Norway.
Review in Consortium psychiatricum, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sustainment of Four Evidence-Based Treatments for Patients with Psychosis: A Prospective Cohort Study in Norway.Administration and policy in mental health · 2026Trial
- A secondary exploratory study of associations between patient- and clinician-reported clinical outcomes and fidelity for four evidence-based psychosis treatments.BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- A collaborative primary and mental health care model with psychologist and psychiatrist working in GP practices: process evaluation of the implementation, challenges, and sustainability.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- Can primary mental health services impact levels of involuntary admissions? A cluster-RCT of the ReCoN intervention.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025Trial
- Integrated care delivery in a rural Norwegian FACT team: an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Transforming public mental health: a review on global trends, challenges, and pathways to change.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026Review
- The perceived fit of guided iCBT in specialised mental healthcare services: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' perspectives.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Effect of crisis resolution team treatment on crisis experience and crisis coping: a multicenter pre-post study in Norway.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Exploring competence in mental health crisis management: a qualitative study of Norwegian prehospital emergency medical personnel.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Conveying the need for mental healthcare - a qualitative study of how patients communicate mental health challenges.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Clinical outcomes and outcome predictors of two-year assertive community treatment in Norway: an explorative prospective pre-post study.BMC psychiatry · 2024Article
- Article
- Something Happened with the Way We Work: Evaluating the Implementation of the Reducing Coercion in Norway (ReCoN) Intervention in Primary Mental Health Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- 'It's not like real therapy': young people receiving child welfare services' experiences of video consultations in mental healthcare in Norway: a mixed methods approach.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Long term outcomes and causal modelling of compulsory inpatient and outpatient mental health care using Norwegian registry data: Protocol for a controversies in psychiatry research project.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2023Article
- Mental health professionals' expectations and efforts to include employment for people with moderate to severe mental illness in treatment settings.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Accessibility and interventions of crisis resolution teams: a multicenter study of team practices and team differences in Norway.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Similarities and differences between service users' and carers' experiences of crisis resolution teams in Norway: a survey.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Associations between personal recovery and service user-rated versus clinician-rated clinical recovery, a cross-sectional study.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community-based mental healthcare in Norway consists of local community mental health centres (CMHCs) collaborating with general practitioners and primary mental healthcare in the municipalities, and with psychiatrists and psychologists working in private practices. The CMHCs were developed from the 1980s to give a broad range of comprehensive mental health services in local catchment areas. The CMHCs have outpatient clinics, mobile teams, and inpatient wards. They serve the larger group of patients needing specialized mental healthcare, and they also collaborate with the hospital-based mental health services. Both CMHCs and hospitals are operated by 19 health trusts with public funding. Increasing resources in community-based mental healthcare was a major aim in a national plan for mental health between 1999 and 2008. The number of beds has decreased in CMHCs the last decade, while there has been an increase in mobile teams including crisis resolution teams (CRTs), early intervention teams for psychosis and assertive community treatment teams (ACT teams). Team-based care for mental health problems is also part of primary care, including care for patients with severe mental illnesses. Involuntary inpatient admissions mainly take place at hospitals, but CMHCs may continue such admissions and give community treatment orders for involuntary treatment in the community. The increasing specialization of mental health services are considered to have improved services. However, this may also have resulted in more fragmented services and less continuity of care from service providers whom the patients know and trust. This can be a particular problem for patients with severe mental illnesses. As the outcomes of routine mental health services are usually not measured, the effects of community-based mental care for the patients and their families, are mostly unknown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.