Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38601033›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2024

New fossil of

Xiaoyu Yang, M Teresa Aguado, Conrad Helm, Zhiqian Zhang, Christoph Bleidorn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Polychaete annelids from the earliest Cambrian Period.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. New fossil ofRoyal Society open science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoyu YangYunnan Key Laboratory for Palaeobiology, Institute of Palaeontology, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, People's Republic of China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8919-6577
M Teresa AguadoAnimal Evolution and Biodiversity, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen 37073, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5583-7516
Conrad HelmAnimal Evolution and Biodiversity, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen 37073, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0308-8402
Zhiqian ZhangSchool of Fine Arts, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650500, People's Republic of China.
Christoph BleidornAnimal Evolution and Biodiversity, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen 37073, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7295-6616
University of Göttingen · DEYunnan Normal University · CNYunnan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular clock estimates suggest the origin of Annelida dates back to the Ediacaran period, which is in discordance with the first appearance of this taxon in the early Cambrian, as evidenced by the fossil records of stem-group and basally branching crown-group annelids. Using new material from the early Cambrian Guanshan biota (Cambrian Series 2, Stage 4), we re-interpret

Indexed as

crown annelidsearly CambrianErrantiaGuanshan biotapalaeoecology

Identifiers

PMID38601033
PMCPMC11004674
OpenAlexW4394689386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.