ArticleJournal of orthopaedics2024
Femoral interference screw divergence as a result of anteromedial portal insertion and outside-in FlipCutter femoral tunnel drilling: A cadaveric study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and objectives: To investigate whether interference screw fixation through an anteromedial portal into an outside-in drilled femoral tunnel via a flip cutter results in acceptable hardware position. Materials & methods: 10 cadaveric knees underwent ACL-reconstruction with patellar BTB autograft. Femoral tunnel drilling was performed utilizing an outside-in flip cutter drill and interference screws for femoral fixation. Lateral and anterior-posterior (AP) fluoroscopic images were taken to measure screw divergence within the femoral tunnel. The means of AP and lateral divergence angles were compared using two-tailed t-tests. Results: Using the flip cutter, the AP and lateral divergence angles were 7.3° ± 4.5° and 9.3° ± 9.3°, respectively, while the total divergence angles were 16.6° ± 11.8°. Divergence angles using a cannulated reamer were found to be 14.4° ± 2.5° and 6.8° ± 2.8° for AP and lateral, respectively and 21.1° ± 5.2° for the total divergence. The AP divergence angles using the flip cutter were significantly less than those reported using a cannulated reamer (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The flip cutter method resulted in significantly reduced divergence angle between the screw and graft when compared to previous cadaveric studies in the coronal plane. There was no significant difference in divergence angle in the sagittal plane. Both methods appear to result in divergence angles below the threshold which would be considered to significantly decrease pull-out strength. Large standard deviations also reflect limited sample size but may also suggest more variability in divergence when compared to historical control set. This study clearly establishes the outside-in technique using a retrograde reamer as a viable independent femoral drilling solution for ACL reconstruction when using a BTB autograft with a femoral interference screw.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.