Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38600958›Full record

ArticleStudies in mycology2024

A review of recently introduced

C M Visagie, N Yilmaz, S Kocsubé, J C Frisvad, V Hubka, R A Samson, J Houbraken

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Studies in mycology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. An Updated Taxonomy ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Aspergillosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  12. Diversity of MycotoxigenicFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A new species ofPeerJ · 2026
    Article
  17. Bioconversion of food wastewater intoFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  18. Three newMycoKeys · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

C M VisagieDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
N YilmazDepartment of Biochemistry, Genetics and Microbiology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
S KocsubéDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, 6726 Szeged, Hungary.
J C FrisvadDepartment of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Søltofts Plads, Building 221, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, DK-2800 Kgs, Denmark.
V HubkaDepartment of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
R A SamsonWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J HoubrakenWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The order

Indexed as

Accepted species listAspergillaceaeDNA barcodesnew taxanomenclaturePenicillaginaceaephylogenetic species conceptThermoascaceaeTrichocomaceae

Identifiers

PMID38600958
PMCPMC11003441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.