ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2024
Assessing the Efficacy of Novel Fiber-Reinforced Dual-Cure Luting Resins.
Article in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of CAD-CAM block thickness and translucency on the polymerization of luting materials.BMC oral health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Dual-cure resin-based luting materials are increasingly favored in clinical applications due to their capacity to establish a strong bond with natural tooth structure and restorations. This study aimed to examine certain physical and handling characteristics of newly developed experimental dual-cure luting resins reinforced with short fibers (SFRCs) and compare them with commercially available dual-cure luting resins. Material and Methods: Seven dual-cure luting materials were tested (Relyx Ultimate, Duo-Link, eCEMENT, Variolink Esthetic, G-CEM LinkForce, experimental SFRC1, experimental SFRC2). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was utilized to determine the degree of monomer conversion (DC%) in the self and light-curing protocol. A rotating disk rheometer measured viscosity at room temperature (22°C) and simulated mouth temperature (35°C). Fracture toughness, flexural strength, and flexural modulus were evaluated using a 3-point bending test. Each luting resin was subjected to the examination of its surface microstructure using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a significance level of ( Results: It was revealed that DC% of the tested dual-cure resins was significantly ( Conclusions: The experimental fiber-reinforced dual-cure luting resins exhibited superior DC%, fracture toughness, and flexural properties, yet, SFRC2 showed the highest viscosity at elevated temperature. These results highlight the capability of short fiber reinforcement to enhance the mechanical properties of dual-cured resin-based luting materials without compromising handling characteristics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.