ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Pseudophakic Pupillary Block due to the Capsular Bag Intraocular Lens Implant Located in the Sulcus: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pupillary block, a concerning complication of cataract surgery, is heightened when a single-piece acrylic (SPA) intraocular lens (IOL) is implanted in the ciliary sulcus. We report an unusual occurrence of relative pupillary block and chronic angle-closure glaucoma (ACG) identified in the late postoperative period due to unintentional SPA IOL implantation in the sulcus. Case Presentation: An 82-year-old woman presented with a history of chronic ACG 5 years after bilateral cataract extraction. Postoperatively, she experienced anterior chamber shallowing, elevated intraocular pressure (IOP), and two acute angle-closure attacks in the left eye, successfully managed with laser peripheral iridotomies (LPIs). Despite neodymium:YAG capsulotomy, elevated IOP persisted. Maximal medical therapy effectively controlled IOP; however, a shallow anterior chamber remained, prompting referral to our glaucoma service. Slit-lamp examination revealed a shallow peripheral anterior chamber, patent LPIs, and an Alcon SA60WF SPA IOL situated posteriorly with the optic against the pupil margin OS. Gonioscopy indicated a closed angle with peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS). Ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) confirmed haptics in the sulcus, with the lens optic and haptics anterior to the bag. These findings suggest relative pupillary block as the cause of her chronic ACG. The SPA IOL's bulky haptics in the sulcus likely induced iris bowing, leading to prolonged appositional angle-closure and chronic PAS formation. Conclusion: IOLs designed for the capsular bag should not be placed in the sulcus. Therefore, IOLs of varying dimensions should be taken to the operating room in the event of complicated cataract extraction. Finally, UBM proves valuable in identifying causes of pupillary block.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.