Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38600682›Full record

ArticleEuropean stroke journal2024

Urban-rural inequalities in IV thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: A nationwide study.

Sine Mette Øgendahl Buus, Anne Brink Behrndtz, Marie Louise Schmitz, Jakob Nebeling Hedegaard, Pia Cordsen, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Thanh Phan, Grethe Andersen, Claus Ziegler Simonsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European stroke journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sine Mette Øgendahl BuusDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5576-4049
Anne Brink BehrndtzDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Marie Louise SchmitzDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Jakob Nebeling HedegaardDanish Center for Health Services Research, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Pia CordsenDanish Center for Health Services Research, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Søren Paaske JohnsenDanish Center for Health Services Research, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Thanh PhanDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash health, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3400-6323
Grethe AndersenDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Claus Ziegler SimonsenDepartment of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRural residency has been associated with lower reperfusion treatment rates for acute ischemic stroke in many countries. We aimed to explore urban-rural differences in IV thrombolysis rates in a small country with universal health care, and short transport times to stroke units. PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this nationwide cohort study, adult ischemic stroke patients registered in the Danish Stroke Registry (DSR) between 2015 and 2020 were included. The exposure was defined by residence rurality. Data from the DSR, Statistics Denmark, and the Danish Health Data Authority, were linked on the individual level using the Civil Registration Number. Adjusted treatment rates were calculated by balancing baseline characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weights.

resultsAmong the included 56,175 patients, prehospital delays were shortest for patients residing in capital municipalities (median 4.7 h), and longest for large town residents (median 7.1 h). Large town residents were predominantly admitted directly to a comprehensive stroke center (98.5%), whereas 30.9% of capital residents were admitted to a hospital with no reperfusion therapy available (non-RT unit). Treatment rates were similar among all non-rural residents (18.5%-18.7%), but slightly lower among rural residents (17.2% [95% CI 16.5-17.8]). After adjusting for age, sex, immigrant status, and educational attainment, rural residents reached treatment rates comparable to capital and large town residents at 18.5% (95% CI 17.7-19.4). DISCUSSION AND

conclusionWhile treatment rates varied minimally by urban-rural residency, substantial differences in median prehospital delay and admission to non-RT units underscored marked urban-rural differences in potential obstacles to reperfusion therapies.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokeRegistriesRural PopulationThrombolytic TherapyUrban PopulationAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime-to-Treatmentfibrinolytic agentsHealthcare disparitiesischemic strokereperfusionrural populationthrombolytic therapyurban population

Identifiers

PMID38600682
PMCPMC11418494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.