ArticleThe American journal of case reports2024
Type A aortic dissection after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAortic dissection is rare after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). It is a potentially fatal complication of cardiac surgery. Reoperation may pose problems with thoracotomy, adhesiolysis, and myocardial protection. No standard treatment guidelines exist for chronic aortic dissection after CABG. We present a case of chronic type A aortic dissection after cardiac surgery, which was successfully treated. CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old female patient presented with a medical background of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia. No connective tissue disorders were diagnosed. The aortic valve was tricuspid. Three years ago, she had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting involving four branches at a different medical facility. She was complaining of chest pain weeks after bypass surgery, which gradually increased. Aortic dissection was observed in the latest contrast-enhanced CT scan. Beginning from just above the sinotubular junction and reaching below the brachiocephalic trunk. Two grafts from the saphenous vein were patent, and one was lying just below the sternum. Cardiopulmonary support was initiated by cannulating the right femoral artery and vein. An opening in the ascending aorta exposed an intimal tear near the proximal anastomosis of the two great saphenous vein grafts. Antegrad Del-Nido cardioplegia was given through native ostia and functional bypass grafts. Proximal and then distal anastomosis of graft prosthesis was performed. A new venous graft was anastomosed to the apical part of the left anterior descending artery (LAD). This saphenous vein and the buttons of the two previous vein grafts were anastomosed to the prosthesis. The patient was successfully liberated from the heart-lung machine and exhibited favorable cardiac function in the postoperative period.
conclusionsWe can conclude that initial peripheral cannulation with a half dose of heparin provides a relatively bloodless and secure re-entry sternotomy. Del-Nido cardioplegia is easy to implement, safe, and gives surgeons enough time without interruptions to perform complex procedures fluently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.