Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38600665›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

scINRB: single-cell gene expression imputation with network regularization and bulk RNA-seq data.

Yue Kang, Hongyu Zhang, Jinting Guan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yue KangDepartment of Automation, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Hongyu ZhangDepartment of Automation, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Jinting GuanDepartment of Automation, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9433-5677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) facilitates the study of cell type heterogeneity and the construction of cell atlas. However, due to its limitations, many genes may be detected to have zero expressions, i.e. dropout events, leading to bias in downstream analyses and hindering the identification and characterization of cell types and cell functions. Although many imputation methods have been developed, their performances are generally lower than expected across different kinds and dimensions of data and application scenarios. Therefore, developing an accurate and robust single-cell gene expression data imputation method is still essential. Considering to maintain the original cell-cell and gene-gene correlations and leverage bulk RNA sequencing (bulk RNA-seq) data information, we propose scINRB, a single-cell gene expression imputation method with network regularization and bulk RNA-seq data. scINRB adopts network-regularized non-negative matrix factorization to ensure that the imputed data maintains the cell-cell and gene-gene similarities and also approaches the gene average expression calculated from bulk RNA-seq data. To evaluate the performance, we test scINRB on simulated and experimental datasets and compare it with other commonly used imputation methods. The results show that scINRB recovers gene expression accurately even in the case of high dropout rates and dimensions, preserves cell-cell and gene-gene similarities and improves various downstream analyses including visualization, clustering and trajectory inference.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSingle-Cell AnalysisCluster AnalysisGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingRNA-SeqSequence Analysis, RNASoftwarebulk RNA-seq dataimputationnetwork regularizationnon-negative matrix factorizationsingle-cell expression data

Identifiers

PMID38600665
PMCPMC11006796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.