ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
scINRB: single-cell gene expression imputation with network regularization and bulk RNA-seq data.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- scGACL: a generative adversarial network with multi-scale contrastive learning for accurate single-cell RNA sequencing imputation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Review
- Improved gene regulatory network inference from single cell data with dropout augmentation.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- scTsI: an effective two-stage imputation method for single-cell RNA-seq data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) facilitates the study of cell type heterogeneity and the construction of cell atlas. However, due to its limitations, many genes may be detected to have zero expressions, i.e. dropout events, leading to bias in downstream analyses and hindering the identification and characterization of cell types and cell functions. Although many imputation methods have been developed, their performances are generally lower than expected across different kinds and dimensions of data and application scenarios. Therefore, developing an accurate and robust single-cell gene expression data imputation method is still essential. Considering to maintain the original cell-cell and gene-gene correlations and leverage bulk RNA sequencing (bulk RNA-seq) data information, we propose scINRB, a single-cell gene expression imputation method with network regularization and bulk RNA-seq data. scINRB adopts network-regularized non-negative matrix factorization to ensure that the imputed data maintains the cell-cell and gene-gene similarities and also approaches the gene average expression calculated from bulk RNA-seq data. To evaluate the performance, we test scINRB on simulated and experimental datasets and compare it with other commonly used imputation methods. The results show that scINRB recovers gene expression accurately even in the case of high dropout rates and dimensions, preserves cell-cell and gene-gene similarities and improves various downstream analyses including visualization, clustering and trajectory inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.