ArticleDrug testing and analysis2025
Alternative routine for reporting chiral amphetamine test results in assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medication: experiences from 2013 to 2023.
Article in Drug testing and analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- Prevalence of AAS-Positive Samples at Drug Abuse Laboratory Sweden Between 2014 and 2023 and Sub-Study of Dual Use of AAS and Narcotics.Drug testing and analysis · 2025Article
- Origin and Interpretation of Low Methamphetamine Levels Found in Amphetamine-Positive Urine Samples: Support for Methylation of Amphetamine as a Minor Metabolic Pathway.Drug testing and analysis · 2025Article
- Workplace Drug Testing-Prevalence of Positive Test Results, Most Common Substances, and Importance of Medical Review.Drug testing and analysis · 2025Article
- Alternative routine for reporting chiral amphetamine test results in assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder medication: experiences from 2013 to 2023.Drug testing and analysis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated an alternative routine for reporting urinary chiral amphetamine results in assessment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment with amphetamine medications and for detecting side-use of illicit racemic amphetamine. Currently in Sweden, only enantiopure d-amphetamine-based ADHD medications (lisdexamphetamine dimesylate and dexamphetamine sulfate) are approved. It is therefore unsuitable to express the chiral result as the l/d-ratio, as before, because l-amphetamine should not be present provided treatment compliance. A new routine for LC-MS/MS chiral amphetamine testing was therefore introduced in 2020, whereby the relative proportion (%) of l-amphetamine and the total amphetamine and creatinine concentrations are reported. Evaluation of the new routine on 24,354 results from 2013 to 2023 revealed that it was useful to distinguish ADHD medication adherence from illicit drug use as the source for a positive test. The l-amphetamine proportion also reflected the enantiomeric content of the medications used. Overall, most results confirmed adherence to ADHD medication, as the l-amphetamine percentage was <1% in 76% of samples (2023) which is the recommended cutoff with enantiopure d-amphetamine medications. However, in all years, illicit drug use was indicated (>40% l-amphetamine) in 8.3%-14.5% of cases. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the clinical value and utility of a new routine for reporting urinary chiral amphetamine results to differentiate adherence to ADHD medication from illicit drug use. Unlike the l/d-amphetamine ratio, it considers differences in total amphetamine concentration and urine dilution, factors that can affect the interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.