Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38600578›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Understanding social needs screening and demographic data collection in primary care practices serving Maryland Medicare patients.

Claire M Starling, Marjanna Smith, Sadaf Kazi, Arianna Milicia, Rachel Grisham, Emily Gruber, Joseph Blumenthal, Hannah Arem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claire M StarlingImplementation Science, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, MedStar Health Research Institute, 6525 Belcrest Road, Suite 700, Hyattsville, MD, 20782, USA. claire.m.starling@medstar.net.
Marjanna SmithImplementation Science, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, MedStar Health Research Institute, 6525 Belcrest Road, Suite 700, Hyattsville, MD, 20782, USA.
Sadaf KaziDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, 3900 Reservoir Road, Washington, NWDC, 20007, USA.
Arianna MiliciaNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, MedStar Health Research Institute, 3007 Tilden St.Suite 6N, Washington, NWDC, 20008, USA.
Rachel GrishamMaryland Primary Care Program, Maryland Department of Health, 201 W. Preston Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Emily GruberMaryland Primary Care Program, Maryland Department of Health, 201 W. Preston Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA.
Joseph BlumenthalMedStar Center for Biostatistics, Informatics and Data Science, MedStar Health Research Institute, 3007 Tilden St.Suite 6N, Washington, NWDC, 20008, USA.
Hannah AremImplementation Science, Healthcare Delivery Research Program, MedStar Health Research Institute, 6525 Belcrest Road, Suite 700, Hyattsville, MD, 20782, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth outcomes are strongly impacted by social determinants of health, including social risk factors and patient demographics, due to structural inequities and discrimination. Primary care is viewed as a potential medical setting to assess and address individual health-related social needs and to collect detailed patient demographics to assess and advance health equity, but limited literature evaluates such processes.

methodsWe conducted an analysis of cross-sectional survey data collected from n = 507 Maryland Primary Care Program (MDPCP) practices through Care Transformation Requirements (CTR) reporting in 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize practice responses on social needs screening and demographic data collection. A stepwise regression analysis was conducted to determine factors predicting screening of all vs. a targeted subset of beneficiaries for unmet social needs.

resultsAlmost all practices (99%) reported conducting some form of social needs screening and demographic data collection. Practices reported variation in what screening tools or demographic questions were employed, frequency of screening, and how information was used. More than 75% of practices reported prioritizing transportation, food insecurity, housing instability, financial resource strain, and social isolation.

conclusionsWithin the MDPCP program there was widespread implementation of social needs screenings and demographic data collection. However, there was room for additional supports in addressing some challenging social needs and increasing detailed demographics. Further research is needed to understand any adjustments to clinical care in response to identified social needs or application of data for uses such as assessing progress towards health equity and the subsequent impact on clinical care and health outcomes.

Indexed as

HousingMedicareAgedCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionHumansMarylandPrimary Health CareUnited StatesCommunity resourcesDemographic data collectionPrimary careSocial needs screening

Identifiers

PMID38600578
PMCPMC11005183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.