Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38600526›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2024

Surveillance of catheter-associated bloodstream infections: development and validation of a fully automated algorithm.

Gaud Catho, Loïc Fortchantre, Daniel Teixeira, Murielle Galas-Haddad, Filippo Boroli, Marie-Noëlle Chraïti, Mohamed Abbas, Stephan Harbarth, Niccolò Buetti, Swissnoso group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. First results of a national deployment of a fully automated central-line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) surveillance system, Switzerland, 2022 to 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gaud CathoInfection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland. Gaud.catho@hcuge.ch.
Loïc FortchantreInfection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Daniel TeixeiraInfection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Murielle Galas-HaddadInfection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Filippo BoroliIntensive Care Unit Division, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marie-Noëlle ChraïtiInfection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mohamed AbbasInfection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stephan HarbarthInfection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Niccolò BuettiInfection Control Programme and World Health Organization Collaborating Centre, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland.
Swissnoso group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost surveillance systems for catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSI) and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are based on manual chart review. Our objective was to validate a fully automated algorithm for CRBSI and CLABSI surveillance in intensive care units (ICU).

methodsWe developed a fully automated algorithm to detect CRBSI, CLABSI and ICU-onset bloodstream infections (ICU-BSI) in patients admitted to the ICU of a tertiary care hospital in Switzerland. The parameters included in the algorithm were based on a recently performed systematic review. Structured data on demographics, administrative data, central vascular catheter and microbiological results (blood cultures and other clinical cultures) obtained from the hospital's data warehouse were processed by the algorithm. Validation for CRBSI was performed by comparing results with prospective manual BSI surveillance data over a 6-year period. CLABSI were retrospectively assessed over a 2-year period.

resultsFrom January 2016 to December 2021, 854 positive blood cultures were identified in 346 ICU patients. The median age was 61.7 years [IQR 50-70]; 205 (24%) positive samples were collected from female patients. The algorithm detected 5 CRBSI, 109 CLABSI and 280 ICU-BSI. The overall CRBSI and CLABSI incidence rates determined by automated surveillance for the period 2016 to 2021 were 0.18/1000 catheter-days (95% CI 0.06-0.41) and 3.86/1000 catheter days (95% CI: 3.17-4.65). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values of the algorithm for CRBSI, were 83% (95% CI 43.7-96.9), 100% (95% CI 99.5-100), 100% (95% CI 56.5-100), and 99.9% (95% CI 99.2-100), respectively. One CRBSI was misclassified as an ICU-BSI by the algorithm because the same bacterium was identified in the blood culture and in a lower respiratory tract specimen. Manual review of CLABSI from January 2020 to December 2021 (n = 51) did not identify any errors in the algorithm.

conclusionsA fully automated algorithm for CRBSI and CLABSI detection in critically-ill patients using only structured data provided valid results. The next step will be to assess the feasibility and external validity of implementing it in several hospitals with different electronic health record systems.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCatheter-Related InfectionsCross InfectionSepsisAlgorithmsCathetersFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesBloodstream infectionCatheter-infectionCLABSIDigitalHealthcare associated infectionsIntensive care unitInternal validationSensitivitySpecificity

Identifiers

PMID38600526
PMCPMC11007875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.