Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38600495›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2024

Dental patients as partners in promoting quality and safety: a qualitative exploratory study.

Enihomo Obadan-Udoh, Vyshiali Sundararajan, Gustavo A Sanchez, Rachel Howard, Siddardha Chandrupatla, Donald Worley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Enihomo Obadan-UdohDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco, School of Dentistry, 707 Parnassus Avenue, D3214, Box #1361, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. enihomo.obadan-udoh@ucsf.edu.
Vyshiali SundararajanDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco, School of Dentistry, 707 Parnassus Avenue, D3214, Box #1361, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Gustavo A SanchezDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco, School of Dentistry, 707 Parnassus Avenue, D3214, Box #1361, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Rachel HowardDepartment of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco, School of Dentistry, 707 Parnassus Avenue, D3214, Box #1361, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Siddardha ChandrupatlaIbn Sina Community Dental Clinic, Houston, TX, USA.
Donald WorleyHealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveActive patient involvement in promoting quality and safety is a priority for healthcare. We investigated how dental patients perceive their role as partners in promoting quality and safety across various dental care settings.

methodsFocus group sessions were conducted at three dental practice settings: an academic dental center, a community dental clinic, and a large group private practice, from October 2018-July 2019. Patients were recruited through flyers or word-of-mouth invitations. Each session lasted 2.5 h and patients completed a demographic and informational survey at the beginning. Audio recordings were transcribed, and a hybrid thematic analysis was performed by two independent reviewers using Dedoose.

resultsForty-seven participants took part in eight focus group sessions; 70.2% were females and 38.3% were aged 45-64 years. Results were organized into three major themes: patients' overall perception of dental quality and safety; patients' reaction to an adverse dental event; and patients' role in promoting quality and safety. Dental patients were willing to participate in promoting quality and safety by careful provider selection, shared decision-making, self-advocacy, and providing post-treatment provider evaluations. Their reactions towards adverse dental events varied based on the type of dental practice setting. Some factors that influenced a patient's overall perception of dental quality and safety included provider credentials, communication skills, cleanliness, and durability of dental treatment.

conclusionThe type of dental practice setting affected patients' desire to work as partners in promoting dental quality and safety. Although patients acknowledged having an important role to play in their care, their willingness to participate depended on their relationship with their provider and their perception of provider receptivity to patient feedback.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePatientsFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleQualitative ResearchDental careHealthcare qualityPatient engagementPatient safetyQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID38600495
PMCPMC11005277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.