Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38600417›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024

Bridging the gap: robotic applications in cerebral aneurysms neurointerventions - a systematic review.

Paweł Marek Łajczak, Bartłomiej Jurek, Kamil Jóźwik, Zbigniew Nawrat

RetractedAbstract readSystematic ReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Haptic feedback in robotic endovascular neurosurgical intervention: A necessity or a commodity?Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paweł Marek ŁajczakDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Jordana 18, Zabrze, 40-043, Poland. pawel.lajczak03@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0281-5417
Bartłomiej JurekDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Jordana 18, Zabrze, 40-043, Poland.
Kamil JóźwikDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Jordana 18, Zabrze, 40-043, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9403-0709
Zbigniew Nawrat2Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Jordana 18, Zabrze, 40-043, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0638-3789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral aneurysm is a life-threatening condition, which requires high precision during the neurosurgical procedures. Increasing progress of evaluating modern devices in medicine have led to common usage of robotic systems in many fields, including cranial aneurysm operations. However, currently no systematic review describes up-to date knowledge of this topic. Following PRISMA guidelines, we have independently screened and extracted works from seven databases. Only studies fulfilling inclusion criteria were presented in this study. Device used, operation time, complications, aneurysm type and patient demographics were extracted from each work. We identified a total of 995 articles from databases. We have found six original works and one supplementary article eligible for this synthesis. Majority of works (4/6) have implemented CorPath GRX in cerebral aneurysm procedures. The procedures involved diverse aneurysm locations, utilizing flow diverters, stents, or coiling. One study described implementation of robot-assist on 117 patients and compared results to randomized clinical trials. One work with a small patient cohort described use of the magnetically-controlled microguidewire in the coiling procedures, without any complications. Additionally, one case-series study described use of a robotic arm for managing intraoperative aneurysm rupture. Currently, robotical devices for cerebral aneurysm treatment mainly lack jailing and haptic feedback feature. Further development of these devices will certainly be beneficial for operators and patients, allowing for more precise and remote surgeries.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial AneurysmRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansRetrospective StudiesStentsTreatment OutcomeAneurysm coilingCerebral aneurysmFlow diverterRobot-assisted surgeryRobot neurointervention

Identifiers

PMID38600417
PMCPMC11006626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.