ArticleAAPS PharmSciTech2024
On the Feasibility of Rugose Lipid Microparticles in Pressurized Metered Dose Inhalers with Established and New Propellants.
Article in AAPS PharmSciTech, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) require optimized formulations to provide stable, consistent lung delivery. This study investigates the feasibility of novel rugose lipid particles (RLPs) as potential drug carriers in pMDI formulations. The physical stability of RLPs was assessed in three different propellants: the established HFA-134a and HFA-227ea and the new low global-warming-potential (GWP) propellant HFO-1234ze. A feedstock containing DSPC and calcium chloride was prepared without pore forming agent to spray dry two RLP batches at inlet temperatures of 55 °C (RLP55) and 75 °C (RLP75). RLPs performance in pMDI formulations was compared to two reference samples that exhibit significantly different performance when suspended in propellants: well-established engineered porous particles and particles containing 80% trehalose and 20% leucine (80T20L). An accelerated stability study at 40 °C and relative humidity of 7% ± 5% was conducted over 3 months. At different time points, a shadowgraphic imaging technique was used to evaluate the colloidal stability of particles in pMDIs. Field emission electron microscopy with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy was used to evaluate the morphology and elemental composition of particles extracted from the pMDIs. After 2 weeks, all 80T20L formulations rapidly aggregated upon agitation and exhibited significantly inferior colloidal stability compared to the other samples. In comparison, both the RLP55 and RLP75 formulations, regardless of the propellant used, retained their rugose structure and demonstrated excellent suspension stability comparable with the engineered porous particles. The studied RLPs demonstrate great potential for use in pMDI formulations with HFA propellants and the next-generation low-GWP propellant HFO-1234ze.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.