New simplified design methods for engineering barriers around contaminated sites with Cauchy boundaries.

Liyilan Zhang, Yiwen Qi, Yuxin Yuan, Yaokai Tan, Guannian Chen, Yan Wang, Tao Wu

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liyilan ZhangSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering and GeographyScience, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.

Yiwen QiSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering and GeographyScience, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.

Yuxin YuanSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering and GeographyScience, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.

Yaokai TanSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering and GeographyScience, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China.

Guannian ChenSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering and GeographyScience, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China. chenguannian@nbu.edu.cn.

Yan WangSchool of Civil & Environmental Engineering and GeographyScience, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China. wangyan@nbu.edu.cn.

Tao WuCollege of Chemistry and Materials Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou, 350005, China.

Funding

the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation No. 2023M743058the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 42107174Zhejiang Provincial Postdoctoral Science Foundation No. ZJ2023111

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the 1980s, low-permeability slurry trench cutoff walls have been widely constructed as barriers to retard the migration of contaminants. The thickness of the cutoff walls is a key determinant of the wall service life. Through a series of theoretical derivations, simplified methods for determining the flux limit and concentration limit were proposed to determine the thickness of cutoff walls for contaminated sites with constant pollutant flux. The relative errors of both the flux-based and concentration-based methods increase as the breakthrough criterion of the ratio between the specified limit concentration of the contaminant to the source concentration (C

Indexed as

Advection‒dispersion equationBreakthrough timeCauchy boundaryCutoff wallsWall thickness design

Identifiers

PMID38600218

DOI10.1038/s41598-024-59119-y

PMCPMC11372200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.