Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38600026›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2024

Regional MRI volumetry using NeuroQuant versus visual rating scales in patients with cognitive impairment and dementia.

Karin Persson, Maria L Barca, Trine Holt Edwin, Lena Cavallin-Eklund, Gro Gujord Tangen, Hanneke F M Rhodius-Meester, Geir Selbæk, Anne-Brita Knapskog, Knut Engedal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Karin PerssonThe Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6198-7804
Maria L BarcaThe Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Trine Holt EdwinDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Lena Cavallin-EklundKarolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gro Gujord TangenThe Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Hanneke F M Rhodius-MeesterDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Geir SelbækThe Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Anne-Brita KnapskogDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Knut EngedalThe Norwegian National Centre for Ageing and Health, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NOKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

Alzheimer Nederland InterACT grant WE.08-2022-06Horizon 2022 project PROMINENT 101112145Memorabel Dementia Fellowship 2021 10510022110004The Southern and Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority 2018078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe aims were to compare the novel regional brain volumetric measures derived by the automatic software NeuroQuant (NQ) with clinically used visual rating scales of medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA), global cortical atrophy-frontal (GCA-f), and posterior atrophy (PA) brain regions, assessing their diagnostic validity, and to explore if combining automatic and visual methods would increase diagnostic prediction accuracy.

methodsBrain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations from 86 patients with subjective and mild cognitive impairment (i.e., non-dementia, n = 41) and dementia (n = 45) from the Memory Clinic at Oslo University Hospital were assessed using NQ volumetry and with visual rating scales. Correlations, receiver operating characteristic analyses calculating area under the curves (AUCs) for diagnostic accuracy, and logistic regression analyses were performed.

resultsThe correlations between NQ volumetrics and visual ratings of corresponding regions were generally high between NQ hippocampi/temporal volumes and MTA (r = -0.72/-0.65) and between NQ frontal volume and GCA-f (r = -0.62) but lower between NQ parietal/occipital volumes and PA (r = -0.49/-0.37). AUCs of each region, separating non-dementia from dementia, were generally comparable between the two methods, except that NQ hippocampi volume did substantially better than visual MTA (AUC = 0.80 vs. 0.69). Combining both MRI methods increased only the explained variance of the diagnostic prediction substantially regarding the posterior brain region.

conclusionsThe findings of this study encourage the use of regional automatic volumetry in locations lacking neuroradiologists with experience in the rating of atrophy typical of neurodegenerative diseases, and in primary care settings.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionAtrophyBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingautomatic regional volumetrycognitive impairmentdementiaMRINeuroQuantvisual rating scale

Identifiers

PMID38600026
PMCPMC10839122
OpenAlexW4391537806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.