ArticleNeonatology2024
LISA Eligibility and LISA Success in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Single-Center Experience.
Article in Neonatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Safety of Less Invasive Surfactant Administration in Preterm Infants: A Meta-Analysis.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Pooled it
- Cytokine patterns in very low birth weight infants under different cord clamping strategies: preliminary EXPLAIN trial data.BMC pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Very Low Birth Weight Infants Following Extrauterine Placental Perfusion: A Follow-Up Study.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2025Trial
- Midazolam as premedication for less invasive surfactant administration: a prospective single-centre audit.BMJ paediatrics open · 2026Article
- Impact of LISA failure on 2-year neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants: a retrospective cohort study.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- Factors Associated with Intubation After Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA); A Single-Center Cohort from Saudi Arabia.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Neonatal Outcomes of the Intubation-Surfactant-Extubation versus Less Invasive Surfactant Administration Method: A National Cohort Study in Korea.Neonatology · 2025Article
- Procedural success and safety of a standardized less invasive surfactant administration protocol using fentanyl premedication and video laryngoscopy in preterm infants <32 weeks' gestation.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Selective Extrauterine Placental Perfusion in Monochorionic Twins Is Feasible-A Case Series.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLess invasive surfactant application (LISA) is associated with improved short-term outcomes in preterm infants. Data on LISA eligibility and success for infants <28 weeks of gestation are lacking.
methodsPreterm infants <28 weeks of gestation who were born and actively treated in our tertiary care center in 2018 were included in the retrospective study. We assessed baseline characteristics, delivery room (DR) management, LISA success and complications, and short-term outcome.
resultsIn total, 57 infants received LISA in the DR. LISA eligibility was 73% at 22 weeks, 88% at 23 weeks, and >90% at gestational ages >24 weeks. LISA was successful in 63% of infants. LISA failure was associated with increased risk for high-grade IVH (OR 17.88), death (OR 10.94), and a reduced chance for survival without complications (OR 8.75).
conclusionOur report justifies LISA as a mode for surfactant application in preterm infants. It contributes to the call for studies to define risk factors for LISA failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.