Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38599184›Full record

Observational studyCardiology2024

Complications in Emergency Department Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome with Contemporary Care.

Tsvetelina Nilsson, Arash Mokhtari, Jenny Sandgren, Jakob Lundager Forberg, Pontus Olsson de Capretz, Ulf Ekelund

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03421873 (Effectiveness and Safety of a Clinical Assessment and 0h/1h Troponin Rule-Out Protocol), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03421873 completednot on this map

Effectiveness and Safety of a Clinical Assessment and 0h/1h Troponin Rule-Out Protocol

TypeobservationalSponsorUlf EkelundRan2018 to 2018Enrolled16,000ConditionsChest Pain, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction, Unstable AnginaArms0h/1h hs-cTnT protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tsvetelina NilssonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Arash MokhtariDepartment of Cardiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jenny SandgrenClinical Studies Sweden, Forum South, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Jakob Lundager ForbergDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden.
Pontus Olsson de CapretzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ulf EkelundDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith the implementation of early reperfusion therapy, the number of complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has diminished significantly. However, ACS patients are still routinely admitted to units with high-level monitoring such as the coronary or intensive care unit (CCU/ICU). The cost of these admissions is high and there is often a shortage of beds. The aim of this study was to analyze the complications in contemporary emergency department (ED) patients with ACS and to map patient management.

methodsThis observational study was a secondary analysis of data collected in the ESC-TROP trial (NCT03421873) that included 26,545 consecutive chest pain patients ≥18 years at five Swedish EDs. Complications were defined as the following within 30 days: death, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock, pulmonary edema, severe ventricular arrhythmia, high-degree atrioventricular (AV) block that required a pacemaker, and mechanical complications such as papillary muscle rupture, cardiac tamponade, or ventricular septum defects (VSDs). Complications were identified via diagnosis and/or intervention codes in the database, and manual chart review was performed in cases with complications.

resultsOf all 26,545 patients, 2,463 (9.3%) were diagnosed with ACS, and 151 of these (6.1%) suffered any complication within 30 days. Mean age was higher in patients with (79.2 years) than without (69.4 years) complications, and more were female (39.7% vs. 33.0%). Eighty-four (3.4% of all ACS patients) patients died, 33 (1.3%) had cardiac arrest, 22 (0.9%) respiratory failure, 13 (0.5%) high-degree AV block, 10 (0.4%) cardiogenic shock, 12 (0.5%) severe ventricular arrhythmia, and 2 each (<0.1%) had VSD or cardiac tamponade. Almost 30% of the complications were present already at the ED, and 40% of patients with complications were not admitted to the CCU/ICU. Only 80 (53%) of the patients with complications underwent coronary angiography and 62 (41%) were revascularized with percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting.

conclusionWith current care, serious complications occurred in only 6 out of 100 ACS patients, and 2 of these complications were present already at the ED. Four out of 10 ACS patients with complications were not admitted to the CCU/ICU and about half did not undergo coronary angiography. Further research is needed to improve risk assessment in ED ACS patients, which may allow more effective use of cardiac monitoring and hospital resources.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeEmergency Service, HospitalAgedArrhythmias, CardiacFemaleHeart ArrestHumansMaleMiddle AgedSwedenAcute coronary syndromeAdmission wardChest painComplicationsMyocardial infarctionUnstable angina

Identifiers

PMID38599184
PMCPMC11633864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.