ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2024
Examining the non-linear effects of education on Alzheimer's and non-Alzheimer's disease: Sex-stratified analysis of 17,671 older persons.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Observational
- The predictive power of employment trajectories on cognition of older adults: Evidence from Chile.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2025Article
- A normative calculator for MoCA domain scores: proxy for Z-scores of conventional neuropsychological tests.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHigher educational attainment is strongly associated with a reduced risk of neurocognitive disorders (NCDs). However, the literature is not yet clear on (1) the minimum years of compulsory education that would sufficiently mitigate the risk of NCDs, and (2) whether educational attainment has differential effects across sexes. To bridge these gaps, this study sought to model potential non-linear relationship between years of education and NCD risk, across men and women.
methodsThe study recruited 17,671 participants from Alzheimer's Disease Centres across United States, aged≥50 years and had normal cognition at baseline. Participants were followed up almost annually, and underwent standardized assessments to diagnose various aetiologies of NCDs. Cox proportional hazard regression was conducted to examine the relationship between years of education and NCD risk, stratified by sexes. Years of education were modelled using restricted cubic spline.
resultsLesser years of education were associated with higher NCD risk in both sexes (specifically, when <12 years of education; HR 1.80-3.48), yet with key differences across sexes. In women, a linear relationship was observed whereby increasing years of education reduced NCD risk correspondingly; but in men, the relationship was non-linear whereby adding years of education beyond 12 years did not reduce NCD risk further. Men of lower educational attainment were at risk of both Alzheimer's Disease (AD; HR up to 3.45) and non-AD (HR up to 2.57), while women of lower educational attainment were only at risk of AD (HR up to 2.11).
conclusionsEducational attainment alters NCD risk differently across sexes, emphasizing the relevance of sex-specific research to better understand the moderating role of sex on NCD risk. The findings also highlight the need to reconsider public policies related to equitable access to education, as well as traditional assumptions on the minimum years of compulsory education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.