Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38598715›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2024

MetSim: Integrated Programmatic Access and Pathway Management for Xenobiotic Metabolism Simulators.

Louis Groff, Antony Williams, Imran Shah, Grace Patlewicz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Louis GroffCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6357-0508
Antony WilliamsCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2668-4821
Imran ShahCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0808-0140
Grace PatlewiczCenter for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3863-9689

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Xenobiotic metabolism is a key consideration in evaluating the hazards and risks posed by environmental chemicals. A number of software tools exist that are capable of simulating metabolites, but each reports its predictions in a different format and with varying levels of detail. This makes comparing the performance and coverage of the tools a practical challenge. To address this shortcoming, we developed a metabolic simulation framework called MetSim, which comprises three main components. A graph-based schema was developed to allow metabolism information to be harmonized. The schema was implemented in MongoDB to store and retrieve metabolic graphs for subsequent analysis. MetSim currently includes an application programming interface for four metabolic simulators: BioTransformer, the OECD Toolbox, EPA's chemical transformation simulator (CTS), and tissue metabolism simulator (TIMES). Lastly, MetSim provides functions to help evaluate simulator performance for specific data sets. In this study, a set of 112 drugs with 432 reported metabolites were compiled, and predictions were made using the 4 simulators. Fifty-nine of the 112 drugs were taken from the Small Molecule Pathway Database, with the remainder sourced from the literature. The human models within BioTransformer and CTS (Phase I only) and the rat models within TIMES and the OECD Toolbox (Phase I only) were used to make predictions for the chemicals in the data set. The recall and precision (recall, precision) ranked in order of highest recall for each individual tool were CTS (0.54, 0.017), BioTransformer (0.50, 0.008), Toolbox

Indexed as

Computer SimulationSoftwareXenobioticsAnimalsHumansXenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID38598715
PMCPMC11325951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.