Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38598603›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2024

Perturbation Variability Does Not Influence Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation.

Tianhe Wang, Guy Avraham, Jonathan S Tsay, Sabrina J Abram, Richard B Ivry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Brain's Sensitivity to Sensory Error Can Be Modulated by Altering Perceived Variability.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A cerebellar population coding model for sensorimotor learning.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tianhe WangDepartment of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0131-850X
Guy AvrahamDepartment of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6170-1041
Jonathan S TsayDepartment of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Sabrina J AbramDepartment of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Richard B IvryDepartment of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.

Funding

Human Cerebellar Function in Multiple Task DomainsR35NS116883 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RICHARD IVRY · 2020 to 2026
$5.3M
Specifying the constraints on cerebellar dependent sensorimotor adaptationR01NS105839 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI IVRY, RICHARD · 2018 to 2019
$709k
Neural Mechanisms Supporting Implicit and Explicit Sensorimotor LearningF31NS120448 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI TSAY, JONATHAN · 2022 to 2023
$62k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS120448NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105839NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS116883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implicit adaptation has been regarded as a rigid process that automatically operates in response to movement errors to keep the sensorimotor system precisely calibrated. This hypothesis has been challenged by recent evidence suggesting flexibility in this learning process. One compelling line of evidence comes from work suggesting that this form of learning is context-dependent, with the rate of learning modulated by error history. Specifically, learning was attenuated in the presence of perturbations exhibiting high variance compared to when the perturbation is fixed. However, these findings are confounded by the fact that the adaptation system corrects for errors of different magnitudes in a non-linear manner, with the adaptive response increasing in a proportional manner to small errors and saturating to large errors. Through simulations, we show that this non-linear motor correction function is sufficient to explain the effect of perturbation variance without referring to an experience-dependent change in error sensitivity. Moreover, by controlling the distribution of errors experienced during training, we provide empirical evidence showing that there is no measurable effect of perturbation variance on implicit adaptation. As such, we argue that the evidence to date remains consistent with the rigidity assumption.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdultComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansLearningMaleModels, NeurologicalMovementPsychomotor Performance

Identifiers

PMID38598603
PMCPMC11034674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.