Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38598526›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

An averaging model for analysis and interpretation of high-order genetic interactions.

Fumiaki Katagiri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fumiaki KatagiriDepartment of Plant and Microbial Biology, Microbial and Plant Genomics Institute, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6893-3788
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While combinatorial genetic data collection from biological systems in which quantitative phenotypes are controlled by active and inactive alleles of multiple genes (multi-gene systems) is becoming common, a standard analysis method for such data has not been established. The currently common approaches have three major drawbacks. First, although it is a long tradition in genetics, modeling the effect of an inactive allele (a null mutant allele) contrasted against that of the active allele (the wild-type allele) is not suitable for mechanistic understanding of multi-gene systems. Second, a commonly-used additive model (ANOVA with interaction) mathematically fails in estimation of interactions among more than two genes when the phenotypic response is not linear. Third, interpretation of higher-order interactions defined by an additive model is not intuitive. I derived an averaging model based on algebraic principles to solve all these problems within the framework of a general linear model. In the averaging model: the effect of the active allele is contrasted against the effect of the inactive allele for easier mechanistic interpretations; there is mathematical stability in estimation of higher-order interactions even when the phenotypic response is not linear; and interpretations of higher-order interactions are intuitive and consistent-interactions are defined as the mean effects of the last active genes added to the system. Thus, the key outcomes of this study are development of the averaging model, which is suitable for analysis of multi-gene systems, and a new, intuitive, and mathematically and interpretationally consistent definition of a genetic interaction, which is central to the averaging model.

Indexed as

Pregnancy, MultipleAllelesFemaleHumansPhenotypePregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38598526
PMCPMC11006166
OpenAlexW4394675077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.