Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38598454›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2024

Modeling endosymbioses: Insights and hypotheses from theoretical approaches.

Lucas Santana Souza, Josephine Solowiej-Wedderburn, Adriano Bonforti, Eric Libby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucas Santana SouzaDepartment of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Josephine Solowiej-WedderburnDepartment of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Adriano BonfortiIntegrated Science Lab, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Eric LibbyDepartment of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6569-5793

Funding

Kempe foundationSwedish Research council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endosymbiotic relationships are pervasive across diverse taxa of life, offering key avenues for eco-evolutionary dynamics. Although a variety of experimental and empirical frameworks have shed light on critical aspects of endosymbiosis, theoretical frameworks (mathematical models) are especially well-suited for certain tasks. Mathematical models can integrate multiple factors to determine the net outcome of endosymbiotic relationships, identify broad patterns that connect endosymbioses with other systems, simplify biological complexity, generate hypotheses for underlying mechanisms, evaluate different hypotheses, identify constraints that limit certain biological interactions, and open new lines of inquiry. This Essay highlights the utility of mathematical models in endosymbiosis research, particularly in generating relevant hypotheses. Despite their limitations, mathematical models can be used to address known unknowns and discover unknown unknowns.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalSymbiosisBiological Evolution

Identifiers

PMID38598454
PMCPMC11006130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.