Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38598442›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

System of wheat intensification (SWI): Effects on lodging resistance, photosynthetic efficiency, soil biomes, and water productivity.

Ramesh Kumar Singh, Pravin Kumar Upadhyay, Shiva Dhar, Rajanna G A, Vinod Kumar Singh, Rakesh Kumar, Rajiv Kumar Singh, Kapila Shekhawat, Sanjay Singh Rathore, Anchal Dass and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Ramesh Kumar SinghICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Pravin Kumar UpadhyayICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5563-4276
Shiva DharICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Rajanna G AICAR- Directorate of Groundnut Research, Regional Station, Ananthapur, India.
Vinod Kumar SinghICAR-Central Research Institute for Dryland Agriculture, Hyderabad, India.
Rakesh KumarICAR-Research Complex for Eastern Region, Patna, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7664-0803
Rajiv Kumar SinghICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Kapila ShekhawatICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Sanjay Singh RathoreICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Anchal DassICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Amit KumarICAR-Research Complex for NEH Region, Sikkim, India.
Gaurendra GuptaICAR- Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, Jhansi, India.
Sudhir RajpootBanaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Ved PrakashBanaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India.
Sayantika SarkarICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Navin Kumar SharmaKrishi Vigyan Kendra, Kaushambi, India.
Satyam RawatICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Satendra SinghICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intense cultivation with narrow row spacing in wheat, a common practice in the Indo-Gangetic plains of South Asia, renders the crop more susceptible to lodging during physiological maturity. This susceptibility, compounded by the use of traditional crop cultivars, has led to a substantial decline in overall crop productivity. In response to these challenges, a two-year field study on the system of wheat intensification (SWI) was conducted. The study involved three different cultivation methods in horizontal plots and four wheat genotypes in vertical plots, organized in a strip plot design. Our results exhibited that adoption of SWI at 20 cm × 20 cm resulted in significantly higher intercellular CO2 concentration (5.9-6.3%), transpiration rate (13.2-15.8%), stomatal conductance (55-59%), net photosynthetic rate (126-160%), and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) interception (1.6-25.2%) over the existing conventional method (plant geometry 22.5 cm × continuous plant to plant spacing) of wheat cultivation. The lodging resistance capacity of both the lower and upper 3rd nodes was significantly higher in the SWI compared to other cultivation methods. Among different genotypes, HD 2967 demonstrated the highest recorded value for lodging resistance capacity, followed by HD 2851, HD 3086, and HD 2894. In addition, adoption of the SWI at 20 cm × 20 cm enhanced crop grain yield by 36.9-41.6%, and biological yield by 27.5-29.8%. Significantly higher soil dehydrogenase activity (12.06 μg TPF g-1 soil hr-1), arylsulfatase activity (82.8 μg p-nitro phenol g-1 soil hr-1), alkaline phosphatase activity (3.11 n moles ethylene g-1 soil hr-1), total polysaccharides, soil microbial biomass carbon, and soil chlorophyll content were also noted under SWI over conventional method of the production. Further, increased root volumes, surface root density and higher NPK uptake were recorded under SWI at 20×20 cm in comparison to rest of the treatments. Among the tested wheat genotypes, HD-2967 and HD-3086 had demonstrated notable increases in grain and biological yields, as well as improvements in the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and chlorophyll content. Therefore, adoption of SWI at 20 cm ×20 cm (square planting) with cultivars HD 2967 might be the best strategy for enhancing crop productivity and resource-use efficiency under the similar wheat growing conditions of India and similar agro-ecotypes of the globe.

Indexed as

SoilTriticumBiomassChlorophyllEdible GrainWaterChlorophyllSoilWater

Identifiers

PMID38598442
PMCPMC11006180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.