Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38598423›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A profile of urban agricultural growers, organizations, their needs, and challenges in the Northeastern United States.

Matthew L Richardson, John R Taylor, Megan J Thompson, Anusuya Rangarajan, Mamatha Hanumappa, Neith G Little

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew L RichardsonCenter for Urban Research, Engagement and Scholarship, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-9769-1669
John R TaylorDepartment of Plant Sciences and Entomology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Megan J ThompsonCenter for Urban Research, Engagement and Scholarship, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Anusuya RangarajanSchool of Integrative Plant Sciences-Horticulture Section, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
Mamatha HanumappaCenter for Urban Research, Engagement and Scholarship, University of the District of Columbia, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Neith G LittleAgriculture and Food Systems Program, University of Maryland Extension, Baltimore City Office, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3702-1668
University of the District of Columbia · USCornell University · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Rhode Island · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban agriculture is increasingly valued as a strategy for improving quality of life in cities, but urban growers face challenges and often lack coordinated support from governments and the agricultural industry. We surveyed urban growers through an online survey, primarily in the Northeastern United States, to develop a profile of growers and associated organizations, assess the current state of urban agriculture, and determine how universities could help meet their needs. A total of 394 respondents completed the survey and most urban growers were white (non-Hispanic) and younger than 45 years old. Women and men were in almost equal proportion. Urban growers were well-educated, but most did not receive a degree in agriculture. Urban agriculture in our study area was dominated by relatively small non-profit organizations and home and community gardens were the most common types of organizations. Urban agricultural organizations want to improve environmental sustainability and socio-cultural conditions through food access and security, regardless of their tax status. Urban growers face diverse barriers and challenges and the most ubiquitous barriers and challenges reported by respondents were related to availability of land and long-term access in urban areas. Many respondents received low revenue or were operating at a net loss even though they reported diverse income streams. Respondents need a wide range of training, including in traditional agricultural topics as well as financial management and business trainings. Universities can play a key role in promoting urban agriculture by offering training and research. Workforce development is a large priority among universities, so urban growers should regularly be consulted, and the results shared with career and workforce development professionals and researchers in urban areas to identify training and research that meets the needs of stakeholders.

Indexed as

AgricultureQuality of LifeCitiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew EnglandOrganizations

Identifiers

PMID38598423
PMCPMC11006126
OpenAlexW4394694714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.