Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38598165›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2024

Spinet-QSM: model-based deep learning with schatten p-norm regularization for improved quantitative susceptibility mapping.

Vaddadi Venkatesh, Raji Susan Mathew, Phaneendra K Yalavarthy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Research progress on quantitative magnetic susceptibility imaging reconstruction method based on improved U-network model].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vaddadi VenkateshDepartment of Computational and Data Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560012, India.
Raji Susan MathewSchool of Data Science, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, 695551, India.
Phaneendra K YalavarthyDepartment of Computational and Data Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, Karnataka, 560012, India. yalavarthy@iisc.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4810-352X
Indian Institute of Science Bangalore · INIndian Institute of Science Education and Research Thiruvananthapuram · IN

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India S. Ramachandran-National Bioscience Award for Career Development
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveQuantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) provides an estimate of the magnetic susceptibility of tissue using magnetic resonance (MR) phase measurements. The tissue magnetic susceptibility (source) from the measured magnetic field distribution/local tissue field (effect) inherent in the MR phase images is estimated by numerically solving the inverse source-effect problem. This study aims to develop an effective model-based deep-learning framework to solve the inverse problem of QSM. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis work proposes a Schatten

resultsThe proposed method was compared with deep learning-based approaches, such as QSMnet, and model-based deep learning approaches, such as learned proximal convolutional neural network (LPCNN). Reconstructions performed using 77 imaging volumes with different acquisition protocols and clinical conditions, such as hemorrhage and multiple sclerosis, showed that the proposed approach outperformed existing state-of-the-art methods by a significant margin in terms of quantitative merits.

conclusionThe proposed SpiNet-QSM showed a consistent improvement of at least 5% in terms of the high-frequency error norm (HFEN) and normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) over other QSM reconstruction methods with limited training data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrainDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerBrain MappingHumansMagnetic FieldsMultiple SclerosisDipole inversionModel-based deep learningSchatten p-normSusceptibility reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID38598165
OpenAlexW4394693022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.