Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38598162›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2024

Health system implementation of the PROMIS Cognitive Function Screener in the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit: framing as abilities versus concerns.

Jordan M Harrison, Natalie C Ernecoff, Jin-Shei Lai, Janel Hanmer, Rebecca Weir, Anthony Rodriguez, Michelle M Langer, Maria O Edelen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jordan M HarrisonRAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue #600, 15213, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. jharriso@rand.org.ORCID 0000-0002-4932-8504
Natalie C ErnecoffRAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue #600, 15213, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jin-Shei LaiNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Janel HanmerDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Rebecca WeirRAND Corporation, Arlington, VA, USA.
Anthony RodriguezRAND Corporation, Boston, MA, USA.
Michelle M LangerNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Maria O EdelenRAND Corporation, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Using the PROMIS Cognition Item Bank for Early Detection of Cognitive Decline in Primary CareR61AG069776 · NIA · RAND CORPORATION · PI EDELEN, MARIA ORLANDO · 2020 to 2021
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS R61 AG069776NIA NIH HHS R61AG069776
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCognitive assessment is a required component of the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit (AWV). In this prospective study, we evaluated acceptability and usefulness of a patient-reported outcome measure (the PROMIS® Cognitive Function Screener, or PRO-CS) to screen for cognitive impairment during the AWV. We compared two versions of the PRO-CS: Abilities and Concerns.

methodsWe developed PRO-CS Abilities and PRO-CS Concerns using items from the PROMIS Cognitive Function item banks. We partnered with a large health system in Pennsylvania to implement an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated version of the 4-item PRO-CS into their AWV workflow. PRO-CS Abilities was implemented in June 2022 and then replaced with PRO-CS Concerns in October 2022. We used EHR data to evaluate scores on Abilities versus Concerns and their association with patient characteristics. We gathered feedback from providers on experiences with the PRO-CS and conducted cognitive interviews with patients to evaluate their preferences for Abilities versus Concerns.

resultsBetween June 2022 and January 2023, 3,088 patients completed PRO-CS Abilities and 2,614 patients completed PRO-CS Concerns. Mean T-scores for Abilities (54.8) were slightly higher (indicating better cognition) than for Concerns (52.6). 10% of scores on Abilities and 13% of scores on Concerns indicated concern for cognitive impairment (T-score < 45). Both Abilities and Concerns were associated with clinical characteristics as hypothesized, with lower scores for patients with cognitive impairment diagnoses and those requiring assistance with instrumental activities of daily living. Abilities and Concerns had similar negative correlations with depression (r= -0.31 versus r= -0.33) and anxiety (r= -0.28 for both), while Abilities had a slightly stronger positive correlation with self-rated health (r = 0.34 versus r = 0.28). In interviews, providers commented that the PRO-CS could be useful to facilitate conversations about cognition, though several providers noted potential limitations of patient self-report. Feedback from patients indicated a preference for PRO-CS Concerns.

conclusionsOur findings suggest potential utility of the PRO-CS for cognitive screening in the Medicare AWV. PRO-CS Abilities and Concerns had similar associations with patient clinical characteristics, but the Concerns version was more acceptable to patients.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingCognitive DysfunctionAgedCognitionHumansMedicareProspective StudiesUnited StatesAlzheimer’s diseaseCognitionCognitive functionCognitive impairmentDementiaMedicarePrimary careScreening

Identifiers

PMID38598162
PMCPMC11006629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.