ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024
[Artificial intelligence in kidney transplant pathology].
Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-powered insights in pediatric nephrology: current applications and future opportunities.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence and systems biology analysis in stem cell research and therapeutics development.Stem cells translational medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) systems have showed promising results in digital pathology, including digital nephropathology and specifically also kidney transplant pathology.
aimSummarize the current state of research and limitations in the field of AI in kidney transplant pathology diagnostics and provide a future outlook. MATERIALS AND
methodsLiterature search in PubMed and Web of Science using the search terms "deep learning", "transplant", and "kidney". Based on these results and studies cited in the identified literature, a selection was made of studies that have a histopathological focus and use AI to improve kidney transplant diagnostics. RESULTS AND
conclusionMany studies have already made important contributions, particularly to the automation of the quantification of some histopathological lesions in nephropathology. This likely can be extended to automatically quantify all relevant lesions for a kidney transplant, such as Banff lesions. Important limitations and challenges exist in the collection of representative data sets and the updates of Banff classification, making large-scale studies challenging. The already positive study results make future AI support in kidney transplant pathology appear likely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38598097What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.