Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38598086›Full record

Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2024

Anaphylaxis: first clinical presentation, subsequent referral practise, and suspected elicitor-an observational study.

Julie Holst Gudichsen, Emil Aggerholm Bækdal, Frederik Bloch Jessen, Annmarie Touborg Lassen, Carsten Bindslev-Jensen, Charlotte G Mortz, Søren Mikkelsen

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie Holst GudichsenDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Kløvervænget 15, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-2190-9403
Emil Aggerholm BækdalDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Kløvervænget 15, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7125-0985
Frederik Bloch JessenDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Kløvervænget 15, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-9537-5002
Annmarie Touborg LassenEmergency Medicine Research Unit, University of Southern Denmark and Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4942-6152
Carsten Bindslev-JensenDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Kløvervænget 15, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-8940-038X
Charlotte G MortzDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy Centre, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Kløvervænget 15, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Søren MikkelsenThe Prehospital Research Unit, Region of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark. Soeren.mikkelsen@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-5187-7027
University of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaphylaxis is an allergic manifestation characterised by rapid onset and progression. Rapid treatment may be challenging in patients with atypical symptoms or no previous history of anaphylaxis. This study aimed to describe the clinical prehospital presentation of first-time anaphylactic patients. To help target educational initiatives, we sought to identify which groups of medical professionals are most likely to encounter first-time anaphylactic patients and investigated the referral pattern for suspected anaphylactic patients for specialised treatment. A retrospective register-based study from the Region of Southern Denmark. Patients referred to the Allergy Centre, Odense University Hospital, from 2019 to 2021 were included. The medical records were manually reviewed for first contact with the emergency departments or the emergency medical service. 444 patients with suspected anaphylaxis were referred. 226 patients had grade 3-5 systemic allergic reactions as classified by the World Allergy Organisation; 90% had cutaneous symptoms, 63% symptoms from the central nervous system, 42% gastrointestinal symptoms, 40% cardiovascular symptoms, 36% had upper-airway symptoms, and 36% had lower-airway symptoms. Patients treated prehospitally had a significantly more severe degree of anaphylaxis than patients only treated within the hospital. More than half of the patients with suspected anaphylaxis were referred to the Allergy Centre from the emergency departments. Patients with allergies progressing to severe anaphylaxis most often are treated prehospitally before transport to emergency departments. From the emergency departments, they are referred to the allergy centre. Education concerning the immediate treatment of severe anaphylaxis should primarily be targeted towards prehospital care providers.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisReferral and ConsultationAdultAgedDenmarkEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAnaphylaxisEmergency departmentPrehospitalReferral for anaphylaxis

Identifiers

PMID38598086
PMCPMC11467102
OpenAlexW4394678242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.