Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38598066›Full record

SynthesisPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2024

Ex vivo, in vivo and in silico studies of corneal biomechanics: a systematic review.

Maria Vittoria Mascolini, Ilaria Toniolo, Emanuele Luigi Carniel, Chiara Giulia Fontanella

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria Vittoria MascoliniDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1698-9066
Ilaria TonioloDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. ilaria.toniolo@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4072-6597
Emanuele Luigi CarnielDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1195-2096
Chiara Giulia FontanellaDepartment of Industrial Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3844-9842

Funding

MIUR FISR2019_03221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthy cornea guarantees the refractive power of the eye and the protection of the inner components, but injury, trauma or pathology may impair the tissue shape and/or structural organization and therefore its material properties, compromising its functionality in the ocular visual process. It turns out that biomechanical research assumes an essential role in analysing the morphology and biomechanical response of the cornea, preventing pathology occurrence, and improving/optimising treatments. In this review, ex vivo, in vivo and in silico methods for the corneal mechanical characterization are reported. Experimental techniques are distinct in testing mode (e.g., tensile, inflation tests), samples' species (human or animal), shape and condition (e.g., healthy, treated), preservation methods, setup and test protocol (e.g., preconditioning, strain rate). The meaningful results reported in the pertinent literature are discussed, analysing differences, key features and weaknesses of the methodologies adopted. In addition, numerical techniques based on the finite element method are reported, incorporating the essential steps for the development of corneal models, such as geometry, material characterization and boundary conditions, and their application in the research field to extend the experimental results by including further relevant aspects and in the clinical field for diagnostic procedure, treatment and planning surgery. This review aims to analyse the state-of-art of the bioengineering techniques developed over the years to study the corneal biomechanics, highlighting their potentiality to improve diagnosis, treatment and healing process of the corneal tissue, and, at the same, pointing out the current limits in the experimental equipment and numerical tools that are not able to fully characterize in vivo corneal tissues non-invasively and discourage the use of finite element models in daily clinical practice for surgical planning.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCorneaAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaFinite Element AnalysisHumansModels, BiologicalComputational modellingCorneaExperimental testsFinite element modelHuman cornea

Identifiers

PMID38598066
PMCPMC11166853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.