ArticleAIDS and behavior2024
Acceptability of Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy Among People with HIV Receiving Care at Three Ryan White Funded Clinics in the United States.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety and efficacy of long-acting cabotegravir/rilpivirine versus standard oral antiretroviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Pooled it
- What Do People with HIV Want to Know About Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine?AIDS and behavior · 2026Article
- Accelerating Low-Barrier Use of Long-Acting Antiretroviral Therapy to Maximize Impact in People with HIV and Viremia or Adherence Challenges.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2026Review
- Heterogeneity of patient preferences for long-acting HIV treatment among people with HIV in Kenya.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Factors Associated With Preference for Long-Acting Injectable Versus Daily Oral Antiretroviral Therapy Among People With HIV: Findings From the SELIGO Study.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2026Article
- The burden of HIV-related stigma on clinical and quality of life outcomes: results from a systematic literature review.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Acceptability, Facilitators, and Barriers of Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine Among Youth With HIV in the United States.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025Article
- Eligibility and factors associated with long-acting injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine initiation in an urban academic HIV clinic.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2025Article
- Discontinuation of Long-acting Injectable Cabotegravir-Rilpivirine in a Large Clinic Cohort.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Acceptability of long acting injectable antiretroviral therapy in people living with HIV at a large single centre.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Who could benefit the most from long-acting antiretroviral therapy? perspectives of HIV care providers and people with HIV in Florida.AIDS care · 2025Article
- Identifying preferred program delivery attributes for long-acting injectable cabotegravir-rilpvirine in three U.S. HIV clinics: A discrete choice experiment.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2025Article
- Patient and clinic staff perspectives on the implementation of a long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy program in an urban safety-net health system.Implementation science communications · 2024Article
- Long-acting injectable antiretroviral treatment: experiences of people with HIV and their healthcare providers in Uganda.BMC infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Social, economic, and physical side effects impact PrEP uptake and persistence among transgender women in Peru.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Patient Attitudes Toward Self- or Partner-, Friend-, or Family-Administered Long-acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy: A Mixed-Methods Study Across 3 Urban Human Immunodeficiency Virus Clinics.Open forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the acceptability of long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy (LAI-ART) among people with HIV (PWH), especially priority populations, is essential for effective implementation. We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients in three Ryan White-funded HIV clinics in San Francisco, Chicago, and Atlanta. We employed maximal variation sampling across age, gender, race, ethnicity, and time living with HIV and oversampled for individuals with suboptimal clinical engagement. An 8-step hybrid deductive and inductive thematic analysis approach guided data analysis. Between August 2020 and July 2021, we conducted 72 interviews. Median age was 46 years; 28% were ciswomen, 7% transwomen, 44% Black/African-American and 35% Latinx, 43% endorsed a psychiatric diagnosis, 35% were experiencing homelessness/unstable housing, and 10% had recent substance use. Approximately 24% were sub-optimally engaged in care. We observed a spectrum of LAI-ART acceptability, ranging from enthusiasm to hesitancy to rejection. We also characterized four emergent orientations towards LAI-ART: innovator, pragmatist, deliberator, and skeptic. Overall, the majority of participants expressed favorable initial reactions towards LAI-ART. Most approached LAI-ART pragmatically, but acceptability was not static, often increasing over the course of the interview. Participants considered their HIV providers as essential for affirming personal relevance. HIV stigma, privacy concerns, and medical mistrust had varied impacts, sometimes facilitating and other times hindering personal relevance. These findings held across priority populations, specifically young adults, cis/trans women, racial/ethnic minorities, and individuals with suboptimal clinical engagement. Further research is needed to explore the transition from hypothetical acceptance to uptake and to confirm the actual benefits and drawbacks of this treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.