Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38598019›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2024

Adapted Beamforming: A Robust and Flexible Approach for Removing Various Types of Artifacts from TMS-EEG Data.

Johanna Metsomaa, Yufei Song, Tuomas P Mutanen, Pedro C Gordon, Ulf Ziemann, Christoph Zrenner, Julio C Hernandez-Pavon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  4. The effect of EEG lead configuration on early TMS-EEG artifacts.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Johanna MetsomaaDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, P.O. Box 12200, FI-00076 AALTO, Espoo, Finland. johanna.metsomaa@aalto.fi.
Yufei SongHertie-Insitute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Tuomas P MutanenDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, P.O. Box 12200, FI-00076 AALTO, Espoo, Finland.
Pedro C GordonHertie-Insitute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ulf ZiemannHertie-Insitute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Christoph ZrennerDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Julio C Hernandez-PavonDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.

Funding

Academy of Finland 321631Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 466 458 984HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council 810377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) recorded as response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be highly informative of cortical reactivity and connectivity. Reliable EEG interpretation requires artifact removal as the TMS-evoked EEG can contain high-amplitude artifacts. Several methods have been proposed to uncover clean neuronal EEG responses. In practice, determining which method to select for different types of artifacts is often difficult. Here, we used a unified data cleaning framework based on beamforming to improve the algorithm selection and adaptation to the recorded signals. Beamforming properties are well understood, so they can be used to yield customized methods for EEG cleaning based on prior knowledge of the artifacts and the data. The beamforming implementations also cover, but are not limited to, the popular TMS-EEG cleaning methods: independent component analysis (ICA), signal-space projection (SSP), signal-space-projection-source-informed-reconstruction method (SSP-SIR), the source-estimate-utilizing noise-discarding algorithm (SOUND), data-driven Wiener filter (DDWiener), and the multiple-source approach. In addition to these established methods, beamforming provides a flexible way to derive novel artifact suppression algorithms by considering the properties of the recorded data. With simulated and measured TMS-EEG data, we show how to adapt the beamforming-based cleaning to different data and artifact types, namely TMS-evoked muscle artifacts, ocular artifacts, TMS-related peripheral responses, and channel noise. Importantly, beamforming implementations are fast to execute: We demonstrate how the SOUND algorithm becomes orders of magnitudes faster via beamforming. Overall, the beamforming-based spatial filtering framework can greatly enhance the selection, adaptability, and speed of EEG artifact removal.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsArtifactsElectroencephalographyTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedArtifactsBeamformingElectroencephalographyTranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID38598019
PMCPMC11634953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.