ArticleHNO2024
[Communication training in otorhinolaryngology education : Comparison of an online and a classroom-based training course].
Article in HNO, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Use of Digital Technology for Developing Communication Skills in Undergraduate and Postgraduate Medical Education: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- [Competent dialogue management : Delivering bad news].Die Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunication skills are among the most important key qualifications of the medical profession. To what extent these can also be acquired online in medical education in otolaryngology is investigated in this study.
objectiveA voluntary online training for the teaching of communication skills was compared with a corresponding face-to-face format. The question of the extent to which acceptance of the two formats and students' self-assessment of their communicative skills differed was investigated. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn the online training, students were prepared for the topic asynchronously via a video. Thereafter, they were able to conduct consultations with simulation patients online and synchronously. The face-to-face training was comparable in structure and duration and took place in an earlier semester. The acceptance of both seminars was assessed by a questionnaire with 19 items on a five-point Likert scale. Self-assessment of communication skills was measured by a 10-cm visual analog scale pre/post with 16 items.
resultsBoth formats achieved high acceptance with an average score (M) of 2.08 (standard deviation, SD = 0.54) for the online format and M = 1.97 (SD = 0.48) for the face-to-face event. Students' self-assessments of communication skills showed a twofold increase in the online group (M = 1.54, SD = 0.94) compared to the face-to-face group (M = 0.75, SD = 0.87).
conclusionThis study shows that teaching communication skills in the online format was well accepted and resulted in significant changes in students' self-assessment of communication skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.